Hamilton Zoo Analytics — Phase 4 core programme

Coordinates → distance → transformations → linear models → constraints → a defended planning proposal. Six lessons, one printable learner pack.

What this offering is

This is the Phase 4 teaching spine for the Hamilton Zoo mathematics family. It provides six sequenced 60-minute lessons, worked checkpoints and a printable learner pack. After this programme, learners who are ready for a denser independent investigation can continue to Hamilton Zoo Advanced Analytics — the optional interactive capstone.

Data honesty: all coordinates, visitor counts, costs and planning constraints in this programme are fictional classroom data. They are inspired by a zoo-planning context but do not describe Hamilton Zoo's real layout, operations, animals or visitor behaviour.

Cold-teach setup

Provide

Rulers, calculators, graph paper and coloured pencils. A spreadsheet or graphing tool is optional, never required.

Group

Use pairs for checking calculations, then require each learner to annotate the evidence they personally understand.

Protect

Assess mathematics, not prior zoo knowledge, drawing polish, device access or public-speaking confidence.

Six-lesson learning arc

LessonMathematical moveEvidence produced
1. Coordinate briefRead and construct a four-quadrant planning model.Scale, origin, plotted sites and two checked coordinates.
2. Distance routesDerive and use the distance formula through right triangles.Three distances, units and a justified route choice.
3. TransformationsTranslate, reflect and rotate footprints by multiples of 90°.New vertices plus an invariant check.
4. Linear modelsInterpret gradient and intercept in a synthetic visitor-flow model.Graph, equation, prediction and limitation statement.
5. Constraint testingCalculate perimeter and area, then compare feasible design options.Decision matrix with calculations and trade-offs.
6. Expansion proposalSelect and combine evidence without hiding assumptions.One-page proposal and a calculation audit trail.

Te Whare Ako | Why these teaching moves

The sequence uses worked modelling, peer checking and visible success evidence so errors become discussable before the capstone. See Assessment for Learning for feedback and evidence design, and Universal Design for Learning for multiple ways to access and communicate mathematical reasoning.

Assessment contract

The final proposal is sufficient when it includes:

Choice-preserving evidence: learners may submit a written, diagram-led, recorded or teacher-conferenced explanation. Mathematical reasoning is the assessed evidence; presentation performance and personal disclosure are not.