Science Mātauranga Māori Week 1 of 6 Year 9–10

Week 1: Environmental Detective — Investigating What's Wrong

What environmental problems can we actually see, measure, and fix right here at school?

Unit 9: Environmental Mātauranga — Protecting Our Taiao

"How Do We Fix What's Broken in Our Environment?" — A 6-week journey where students use both mātauranga Māori and modern science to take real action on local environmental problems.

Students become environmental detectives, using both Māori observation methods and scientific tools to identify actual problems they can measure and potentially fix at their school.

Focus Question

What environmental problems can we actually see, measure, and fix right here at school?

šŸŽÆ Learning Intentions

  • Identify specific environmental problems using systematic observation
  • Connect traditional Māori environmental knowledge with modern investigation methods
  • Select a realistic environmental problem that students can actually address

āœ… Success Criteria

  • I can identify and document multiple environmental problems at school
  • I can explain how traditional knowledge helps environmental investigation
  • I can work with my team to choose one problem to focus on solving

Ngā Mahi - Week 1 Activities

1. Hook: Environmental Crime Scene (15 mins)

Activity: Show photos of environmental problems: polluted streams, dying plants, litter-covered areas, extreme weather damage. Ask: "If you were an environmental detective, what would you investigate first?"

Kaitiakitanga Connection: Traditional Māori were environmental guardians who observed changes in nature closely. Today we continue this role as modern kaitiaki.

2. Environmental Crime Scene Walk (30 mins)

Activity: Use the Environmental Detective Checklist to systematically investigate problems around the school.

  • Form detective teams of 3-4 students
  • Each team gets a different area to investigate (sports fields, gardens, buildings, waterways)
  • Look for water issues, waste problems, biodiversity loss, energy waste
  • Take photos and rate severity of each problem found
  • Record specific observations, not general statements

3. Problem Ranking & Voting (20 mins)

Activity: Use the Problem Ranking Cards to vote on the most urgent and fixable environmental problems.

Democratic Process: Each student gets 3 voting dots. Vote based on: "How urgent is this?" and "Can we realistically fix it?"

4. Traditional Knowledge Planning (15 mins)

Activity: Introduce the Kaumātua Interview Guide and plan respectful interviews with community elders.

  • Discuss proper tikanga for interviewing kaumātua
  • Identify community members who might share traditional knowledge
  • Arrange interviews through proper cultural protocols
  • Prepare questions about traditional environmental observation methods

5. Team Formation & Problem Selection (10 mins)

Activity: Form environmental action teams around the highest-voted problems. Each team commits to solving one specific issue.

Team Contract: Each team signs a commitment to their chosen environmental problem and action plan timeline.

šŸ”„ Assessment & Next Steps

Formative Assessment:

  • Completed Environmental Detective Checklists with specific observations
  • Participation in problem ranking voting process
  • Team formation and clear problem selection

Into Week 2 — Water Health Check:

  • Each team brings their chosen environmental problem and begins focused water or soil testing in Week 2
  • Kaumātua interviews should be scheduled before Week 2 so traditional knowledge can inform the data collection design
  • Teams who chose a water-related problem will lead Week 2's measurement activities; other teams rotate to observe water systems connected to their chosen issue

šŸ“‹ Kaiako Planning — Week 1

Before This Lesson

  • Print one Environmental Detective Checklist per student — the four categories (water, waste, biodiversity, energy) provide the observation scaffold for the walk
  • Pre-assign 3–4 school zones so teams aren't all gravitating to the same area: sports fields, gardens/planted areas, building perimeter, any drain or stream on the grounds
  • Source 4–6 photos of local NZ environmental problems for the hook — real local examples land better than stock images; look for eroded riverbeds, storm drains with algae, or council rubbish reports from your area
  • If kaumātua connection is planned, make initial contact this week — students need time to prepare respectful questions before the scheduled interview
  • Print Problem Ranking Cards and prepare 3 sticky dots per student for the voting round

Timing Watch

  • The Crime Scene Walk reliably runs long — set a hard 25-minute stop with a 5-minute return buffer
  • If team formation (Activity 5) doesn't complete in class, students can lock in their team and problem via shared doc before Week 2
  • Hook (15 min) → Walk (30 min) → Ranking (20 min) → Kaumātua intro (15 min) → Team formation (10 min) = 90 min tight

Week 1 Differentiation

Students who struggle to get started: the Detective Checklist does most of the scaffolding — pair these students with a confident observer during the walk. Prompt with: "What can you see? What can you smell? Is there anything that looks different from how it should look?"

ELL / ESOL students: pre-teach the four checklist categories and their example problems before the walk (5 min is enough). Allow photo-only evidence during outdoor recording — they can add written descriptions after returning inside.

Extension: ask extension students to rate each problem's severity on a 1–5 scale AND write one sentence explaining what evidence they used for that rating. This requires articulating evidence standards, not just observing.

Accessibility: if the outdoor walk is inaccessible for some students, assign them covered walkway zones or areas observable from inside. The voting and team-formation activities are fully indoors and equally engaging.

Kaitiakitanga grounding: during the hook discussion, ask students if their whānau or community have noticed changes to a local waterway, beach, or bush area. Personal connection before the walk strengthens the kaitiaki framing — students are investigating something real, not a textbook scenario.