Best for
Week 1 launch before the reflection and food-budget tasks. Use it to surface misconceptions about wants, needs, fairness, and limited supply.
Social studies + economics language • Years 9-10 • Unit 10 Week 1
Use these cards to build the language students need before they analyse budgets, trade-offs, or food security choices. The aim is not just matching words to definitions. It is helping ākonga notice how scarcity shapes decisions for whānau, communities, and governments.
This version is ready to teach tomorrow. Te Wānanga becomes useful when you want local supermarket, marae, flood, or harvest examples embedded directly into the card set.
The open sort matters. It lets you see whether students treat scarcity as “not getting what you want” or as a system-level condition that shapes choices.
Read each card aloud once. Clarify pronunciation where needed, especially kai, taonga, and rawaka.
Group the cards in a way that makes sense to your group. You might sort by concept, example, or type of decision.
Pick two cards and explain why they belong together. Use the language of systems, fairness, or trade-offs, not just “they are similar”.
Rauemi iti / rawaka kore
There is not enough of something for everyone who wants or needs it.
Rawaka
There is more than enough, so choices feel less pressured.
Whiriwhiri utu
Choosing one option means giving something else up.
Kai matua
A food people rely on regularly because it is basic to everyday survival.
Haumarutanga kai
Having reliable access to enough safe, nutritious food.
Auaha
Creating a new strategy or tool to solve a problem.
A whānau buys cheaper staples first because the grocery budget is tight.
A drought reduces crop yields, so the community must ration water and food.
Māori storage systems like rua kūmara reduce scarcity by protecting harvests for later.
| My category name | Cards I put here | Why this category makes sense |
|---|---|---|
| ________________ | __________________________________________ | |
| ________________ | __________________________________________ | |
| ________________ | __________________________________________ |
Choose one example of scarcity from your own life, your community, or a recent news story in Aotearoa. Use at least three vocabulary terms in your explanation.
Level 3–4: investigate how economic concepts explain resource decisions; evaluate trade-offs in economic choices; understand that scarcity is a structural condition affecting communities differently based on access and power.
Level 3–4: apply arithmetic and data representation to real economic contexts; read and interpret charts showing resource allocation; understand that accuracy in resource calculation has real consequences for food security.
What is one insight from this activity that connects to the unit's big question: "What Will We Eat Tomorrow?"
Language shapes understanding. When economists use the word "scarcity," they mean a structural condition. In te ao Māori, raranga (scarcity/constraint) is always relational — scarce for whom? Relative to what? These are not the same questions a market economy asks. As you sort the vocabulary in this activity, notice which concepts are easier to define in isolation and which require relationships to make sense — opportunity cost only exists because of trade-off. In te ao Māori, these connections mirror the principle of whanaungatanga: everything is related, and understanding something fully means understanding its connections.
Resources already provided:
Students will engage with this resource to investigate the intersection of kai (food), culture, and climate — exploring how mātauranga Māori approaches to food production, preservation, and distribution offer powerful responses to contemporary food security and climate challenges in Aotearoa New Zealand and globally.
Scaffold support: Provide graphic organisers that map traditional kai practices to modern food security concepts at the entry level. Offer extension tasks asking students to research a specific iwi's traditional food system and evaluate its contemporary relevance, or to investigate a local food sovereignty initiative.
ELL / ESOL: Pre-teach domain vocabulary (food sovereignty, food security, kaitiakitanga, rāhui, maramataka) using visual diagrams and real-world examples. Draw connections to students' own cultural food traditions — these are valid entry points into the unit's themes. Allow oral or visual presentation of learning as alternatives to written tasks.
Inclusion: Kai is a universal human experience — all students have a relationship with food, seasonality, and sharing. Neurodiverse learners benefit from concrete, hands-on engagement with these concepts (e.g., examining a kūmara, mapping seasonal foods). Acknowledge diverse economic circumstances sensitively when discussing food security. Choice in how students demonstrate understanding (written, visual, oral) supports inclusive assessment.
Mātauranga Māori lens: The maramataka — the Māori lunar calendar — is one of Aotearoa's most sophisticated environmental data systems, encoding centuries of ecological observation about planting, harvesting, fishing, and weather patterns. Kūmara cultivation in pre-colonial Aotearoa was a feat of agricultural knowledge adapted to a new climate. Rāhui (temporary resource restrictions) is indigenous resource management — conservation before conservation. Kaitiakitanga frames the relationship between people and kai not as extraction but as reciprocal guardianship. These are not historical curiosities — they are living solutions to contemporary problems.
Prior knowledge: Students benefit from foundational understanding of climate change and food systems. No specialist mātauranga Māori knowledge required for entry-level engagement — the unit builds this knowledge progressively.