Mathematics + social studies • Years 9-10 • Unit 10 Week 1

Food Budget Pie Chart

Students estimate and visualise how a household food budget is divided. The maths matters, but so does the conversation underneath it: what gets prioritised, what gets squeezed, and what scarcity means when families are trying to keep everyone fed.

Ingoa / Name
Akomanga / Class

Best for

Week 1 numeracy task after students have already discussed scarcity and trade-offs in words.

Kaiako use

Model one example first and remind students that estimates are acceptable if they do not know exact numbers. The goal is pattern and priority, not personal disclosure.

Ākonga use

Students assign percentages, draw a pie chart, and explain what the budget pattern shows about needs and choices.

Linked next step

Use this after the Scarcity Reflection so the personal idea of trade-offs becomes visible through numbers.

Free data task, premium local-budget adaptation

This page already works. Te Wānanga becomes useful when you want local supermarket prices, regional kai examples, or a scaffolded version with fixed data sets built in.

  • Insert a fictional class budget instead of a personal estimate.
  • Generate simpler percentage bands for students who need more support.
  • Save a class-ready Unit 10 numeracy pack in My Kete.

Kaiako planning snapshot

  • Use length: 30-40 minutes.
  • Grouping: Individual estimates followed by paired comparison.
  • Prep: Decide whether students use home estimates or a fictional whānau scenario.
  • Teaching move: Keep asking what the numbers suggest about needs, pressure, and prioritising kai. Connect to manaakitanga — food scarcity affects our capacity to care for guests, whānau, and community.
📊 Percentages 🛒 Food systems

Resources already provided

  • Budget category table
  • Pie-chart drawing space
  • Interpretation prompts
  • Percentage-check reminder
  • Teacher-only curriculum companion

If this feels too personal, switch to a fictional household case study. The mathematical reasoning still holds.

Ngā Whāinga Ako / Learning Intentions

  • We are learning to represent budget choices using percentages.
  • We are learning to interpret what a pie chart shows about needs and priorities.
  • We are learning to connect number patterns to the idea of scarcity.

Paearu Angitu / Success Criteria

  • I can estimate percentage categories that total 100%.
  • I can draw and label a pie chart clearly.
  • I can explain what the chart suggests about trade-offs in a food budget.

1. Budget categories

Category Examples Estimated % Notes
Staples / kai matua Rice, bread, pasta, kūmara, potatoes ______% ________________________
Fruit and vegetables Fresh, frozen, canned produce ______% ________________________
Protein Fish, eggs, meat, beans, tofu ______% ________________________
Snacks / extras Treats, drinks, convenience foods ______% ________________________
Other Baby food, allergies, special items ______% ________________________

2. Draw your pie chart

Shade or label each sector clearly. Check that your total equals 100% before you explain the chart.

Quick checks

  • Did your percentages add to 100%?
  • Which category takes the largest share?
  • Which category gets squeezed first when money is tight?
  • What does this tell you about needs versus wants?

3. Interpret the pattern

What stands out?

What does the chart suggest about scarcity?

Ngā Whāinga Akoranga · Learning Intentions

  • Create and interpret pie charts showing how a household allocates its food budget
  • Connect visual data representation to economic concepts of scarcity and opportunity cost
  • Compare different household budgets and analyse what the differences reveal about access and choice

Paearu Angitu · Success Criteria

  • My pie chart is accurate — percentages add to 100% and segments are proportional
  • I can explain what the chart reveals about trade-offs
  • My analysis evaluates what the allocation suggests about the household's situation

Hononga Marautanga · Curriculum Alignment

Social Sciences — Economic Understanding

Level 3–4: investigate how economic concepts explain resource decisions; evaluate trade-offs in economic choices; understand that scarcity is a structural condition affecting communities differently based on access and power.

Mathematics / Numeracy

Level 3–4: apply arithmetic and data representation to real economic contexts; read and interpret charts showing resource allocation; understand that accuracy in resource calculation has real consequences for food security.

Whakaaro Hōhonu · Reflection

What is one insight from this activity that connects to the unit's big question: "What Will We Eat Tomorrow?"

Aronga Mātauranga Māori

In te ao Māori, food allocation has always been a community decision, not just a household one. Manaakitanga required that guests and those in need were fed before the host family — a structural redistribution of resources that prevented extreme inequality within communities. A pie chart of one family's food budget captures individual scarcity; it does not capture the collective systems that historically prevented that scarcity from becoming crisis. As you analyse pie charts, ask: who is not represented in this data? Whose food budget is this measuring?

Ngā Rauemi Tautoko · Support Materials

Resources already provided:

  • This handout — Week 1 introduction to scarcity concepts
  • Quick Reference Card (unit-10-quick-reference-card.html) — scarcity, trade-off, opportunity cost definitions
  • Scarcity Vocabulary Sort (unit-10-week1-scarcity-vocabulary-sort.html) — organise key economic terms
  • Food Budget Pie Chart (unit-10-week1-food-budget-pie-chart.html) — visualise resource allocation

📋 Teacher Planning Snapshot

Ngā Whāinga Ako — Learning Intentions

Students will engage with this resource to investigate the intersection of kai (food), culture, and climate — exploring how mātauranga Māori approaches to food production, preservation, and distribution offer powerful responses to contemporary food security and climate challenges in Aotearoa New Zealand and globally.

Ngā Paearu Angitū — Success Criteria

  • ✅ Students can explain how traditional Māori kai practices (maramataka, kūmara cultivation, rāhui) embody ecological knowledge and food security principles.
  • ✅ Students can connect kai culture and climate scarcity to contemporary community action and food sovereignty movements.

Differentiation & Inclusion

Scaffold support: Provide graphic organisers that map traditional kai practices to modern food security concepts at the entry level. Offer extension tasks asking students to research a specific iwi's traditional food system and evaluate its contemporary relevance, or to investigate a local food sovereignty initiative.

ELL / ESOL: Pre-teach domain vocabulary (food sovereignty, food security, kaitiakitanga, rāhui, maramataka) using visual diagrams and real-world examples. Draw connections to students' own cultural food traditions — these are valid entry points into the unit's themes. Allow oral or visual presentation of learning as alternatives to written tasks.

Inclusion: Kai is a universal human experience — all students have a relationship with food, seasonality, and sharing. Neurodiverse learners benefit from concrete, hands-on engagement with these concepts (e.g., examining a kūmara, mapping seasonal foods). Acknowledge diverse economic circumstances sensitively when discussing food security. Choice in how students demonstrate understanding (written, visual, oral) supports inclusive assessment.

Mātauranga Māori lens: The maramataka — the Māori lunar calendar — is one of Aotearoa's most sophisticated environmental data systems, encoding centuries of ecological observation about planting, harvesting, fishing, and weather patterns. Kūmara cultivation in pre-colonial Aotearoa was a feat of agricultural knowledge adapted to a new climate. Rāhui (temporary resource restrictions) is indigenous resource management — conservation before conservation. Kaitiakitanga frames the relationship between people and kai not as extraction but as reciprocal guardianship. These are not historical curiosities — they are living solutions to contemporary problems.

Prior knowledge: Students benefit from foundational understanding of climate change and food systems. No specialist mātauranga Māori knowledge required for entry-level engagement — the unit builds this knowledge progressively.

Curriculum alignment