Best for
Food-systems science, sustainability inquiry, māra kai learning, and cross-curricular lessons that combine science, social decision-making, and hauora.
Science / Sustainability • Years 6-10 • Systems and decisions
Use this handout to help ākonga trace how kai moves from source to plate, evaluate where waste and emissions can build up, and make decisions through a kaitiakitanga lens rather than simplistic “good food / bad food” thinking.
This handout is classroom-ready. If you want it rebuilt around your local growers, school garden, whānau recipes, or a field trip, Te Wānanga can adapt the prompts while keeping the systems-thinking structure intact.
If the lesson mentions a system map, decision table, or action-planning prompt, those materials are already included.
Use the companion page to connect this handout to systems thinking, sustainability, local food contexts, and cross-curricular decision making.
Food systems in Aotearoa include farms, māra kai, fisheries, supermarkets, kitchens, compost bins, and whānau tables. They are scientific systems, but they are also cultural and economic systems that affect communities differently.
Kaitiakitanga and māhinga kai offer a strong lens here: food choices are not only about consumption, but about reciprocity, care for the whenua and moana, and whether the system can keep giving back.
Every stage uses energy and creates different impacts for people and place. That is why one food decision can never be judged by price alone.
| Kai example | Possible people impact | Possible environment impact | Stronger alternative or improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imported out-of-season fruit | |||
| Heavily packaged lunch item | |||
| Locally grown or shared produce |
Choose one lunch item, meal, or class kai example. Explain how you would redesign the choice to reduce waste, travel, or packaging while still meeting people's needs.
Draw the current system on one side and your improved system on the other. Use arrows and labels to show what changes.
Trace one kai item from source to waste and label the five stages with arrows.
Complete the table and justify one stronger sustainability choice using evidence.
Explain why a “more sustainable” option can still involve trade-offs for cost, access, labour, culture, or convenience.
Level 3–4: Investigate how historical, political, and economic processes shape societies; understand how people participate in communities to create change; analyse different perspectives on social, cultural, and environmental issues.
Level 3–4: Gather, evaluate, and synthesise information from multiple sources; construct well-reasoned arguments using evidence; communicate social science understanding clearly in written, oral, and visual forms.
Social Sciences taught well in Aotearoa should be uncomfortable — because the history of this land is one in which Māori and other communities have faced injustice, and in which those injustices are not yet fully addressed. Mātauranga Māori offers frameworks for thinking about social change that go beyond Western political theory: the concept of tino rangatiratanga (self-determination), of kotahitanga (unity in purpose), of utu (reciprocity across time) — these are not abstract ideas but working tools for analysing how power has been distributed and how it might be redistributed more justly. Social Sciences that centres these frameworks gives students the analytical vocabulary to name what they see in the world and imagine what could be different.
This handout is designed to be used alongside the broader unit resources available at Te Kete Ako handouts library. Related resources from the same unit are linked in the unit planner. All resources are provided — no additional preparation is required to use this handout in your classroom.
Students will engage with this resource to investigate the intersection of kai (food), culture, and climate — exploring how mātauranga Māori approaches to food production, preservation, and distribution offer powerful responses to contemporary food security and climate challenges in Aotearoa New Zealand and globally.
Scaffold support: Provide graphic organisers that map traditional kai practices to modern food security concepts at the entry level. Offer extension tasks asking students to research a specific iwi's traditional food system and evaluate its contemporary relevance, or to investigate a local food sovereignty initiative.
ELL / ESOL: Pre-teach domain vocabulary (food sovereignty, food security, kaitiakitanga, rāhui, maramataka) using visual diagrams and real-world examples. Draw connections to students' own cultural food traditions — these are valid entry points into the unit's themes. Allow oral or visual presentation of learning as alternatives to written tasks.
Inclusion: Kai is a universal human experience — all students have a relationship with food, seasonality, and sharing. Neurodiverse learners benefit from concrete, hands-on engagement with these concepts (e.g., examining a kūmara, mapping seasonal foods). Acknowledge diverse economic circumstances sensitively when discussing food security. Choice in how students demonstrate understanding (written, visual, oral) supports inclusive assessment.
Mātauranga Māori lens: The maramataka — the Māori lunar calendar — is one of Aotearoa's most sophisticated environmental data systems, encoding centuries of ecological observation about planting, harvesting, fishing, and weather patterns. Kūmara cultivation in pre-colonial Aotearoa was a feat of agricultural knowledge adapted to a new climate. Rāhui (temporary resource restrictions) is indigenous resource management — conservation before conservation. Kaitiakitanga frames the relationship between people and kai not as extraction but as reciprocal guardianship. These are not historical curiosities — they are living solutions to contemporary problems.
Prior knowledge: Students benefit from foundational understanding of climate change and food systems. No specialist mātauranga Māori knowledge required for entry-level engagement — the unit builds this knowledge progressively.