Best for
Years 6-10 English, health, social studies, digital technology, and any class using discussion boards, blogs, shared docs, media research, or online publishing.
English / Digital communication • Years 6-10 • Ethics, audience, impact
Support ākonga to participate online with whakaaro, evidence, and respect. This handout moves past basic safety into the harder questions: what a digital footprint means, how audience changes meaning, how to disagree with mana, and how online choices affect real people and communities.
This public handout already provides the footprint case study, ethical-posting checks, and class tikanga builder. Te Wānanga becomes useful when you want the same structure rebuilt around your school's platforms, local issue debates, or a specific digital project.
If the lesson mentions case studies, posting checks, or class norms, those materials are already on this page.
Use the curriculum companion to connect this page to digital and visual texts, respectful discussion, citizenship, and audience-aware communication. The strongest use treats online behaviour as real social participation, not as a separate fake world.
Online words, images, jokes, rumours, and arguments shape real relationships and real reputations. In Aotearoa classrooms, digital citizenship should stay connected to mana, fairness, evidence, and representation. Students need more than "be careful". They need a framework for how to act when they have power to post, share, comment, or amplify.
Protect your details, your passwords, and your wellbeing.
Use language and images that uphold the mana of others.
Check before sharing. Not all content is true, complete, or fair.
Give credit, represent others fairly, and do not use media to harm.
Notice when digital spaces help connection and when they increase stress or distraction.
| Question | What am I checking? | My answer |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Why am I posting this? To inform, connect, persuade, joke, or react? | |
| Accuracy | Do I know this is true, fair, and in context? | |
| Audience | Who could see this now or later? | |
| Impact | How might this affect another person's mana, privacy, or safety? |
A student posts a sarcastic comment and shares a photo from a school event without checking permission. Later the post is screenshotted and spread beyond the original audience.
Use the case study and complete one row of the post-check table with a partner.
Complete the full post-check table, analyse the case study, and draft two online tikanga statements.
Create a short class guide or poster about digital citizenship for a real audience.
Level 4–5: Understand how digital systems and AI tools work; evaluate the social, cultural, and ethical implications of technology; design and apply computational thinking skills to real problems.
Level 3–4: Analyse how technology shapes relationships, power, and identity within communities; evaluate the impacts of digital innovation on society, including effects on Indigenous data sovereignty and cultural representation.
In te ao Māori, data and knowledge are not neutral — they carry whakapapa and obligations. Māori Data Sovereignty (Mana Motuhake i ngā Raraunga) holds that Māori have the right to govern, own, and interpret data about themselves and their communities. When digital systems are designed without this understanding, they risk perpetuating colonial patterns of extraction: taking knowledge from communities without accountability or benefit-sharing. The concept of kaitiakitanga extends naturally to the digital realm — guardianship of what is collected, stored, and shared about us is as important as guardianship of land, water, and living knowledge systems.
This handout is designed to be used alongside the broader unit resources available at Te Kete Ako handouts library. Related resources from the same unit are linked in the unit planner. All resources are provided — no additional preparation is required to use this handout in your classroom.
Students will engage with this resource to explore digital kaitiakitanga — applying tikanga Māori principles of guardianship, manaakitanga, and whanaungatanga to their digital lives, spaces, and technologies.
Scaffold support: Provide sentence starters and visual frameworks to scaffold access at the entry level. Offer extension tasks that deepen ethical analysis — for example, comparing digital tikanga principles to international AI ethics frameworks.
ELL / ESOL: Pre-teach key kupu (kaitiakitanga, manaakitanga, whanaungatanga, tikanga) with bilingual glossaries. Allow students to express ideas in their home language first before translating to English.
Inclusion: Chunk tasks and provide clear visual instructions. Neurodiverse learners benefit from structured choice in how they demonstrate understanding (e.g., verbal, written, or visual). Affirm diverse digital experiences as valid starting points.
Mātauranga Māori lens: Digital kaitiakitanga frames technology through Te Ao Māori — our digital spaces are extensions of our marae, our data is part of our whakapapa, and our online behaviour reflects our mana. Tikanga Māori provides a powerful ethical compass for navigating the digital world.
Prior knowledge: No specialist digital technology knowledge required for entry-level engagement. Best used after introductory lessons on tikanga Māori or as part of a digital technologies unit.