← Back to Unit Overview

Lesson 8: Drawing Conclusions

Answering your original question using the evidence you found.

🎯 Learning Intentions

  • Interpret data to make statements
  • Write a conclusion that directly answers the investigative question
  • Identify limitations in the data

🎥 Media Anchor (8 mins)

Video: Research Skills for Students

  • What level of evidence is enough to support a class conclusion?
  • How do we avoid over-claiming from a small sample?

1. "I Notice, I Wonder" (10 mins)

Look at your graphs and tables. Complete these sentences:

  • "I notice that most students..."
  • "I notice that the difference between..."
  • "I wonder why..."

Example: "I notice that 80% of students bring lunch from home. I wonder if this changes in winter?"

2. Structure of a Conclusion (15 mins)

A good conclusion has three parts:

  1. Claim: The answer to your question. ("Year 8 students prefer rugby over soccer.")
  2. Evidence: The numbers backing it up. ("My data shows 15 students chose rugby, while only 5 chose soccer.")
  3. Meaning: What does this mean in context? ("This suggests rugby is the dominant sport culture in our class.")

3. Task: Draft your Conclusion (20 mins)

Write your conclusion paragraph.

Checklist:

  • Did I mention specific numbers?
  • Did I answer my specific I-V-G question?
  • Is it true based on my data?

4. Evaluation (5 mins)

Reflection: What could you have done better?

  • "My sample size was too small."
  • "My question was confusing."
  • "I only asked my friends."

Admitting mistakes is part of good science!

← Previous Lesson Next Lesson: Presentation →

Curriculum alignment

📋 Teacher Planning Snapshot

Ngā Whāinga Ako — Learning Intentions

Students will engage with this resource to develop statistical investigation skills — planning inquiries, collecting and analysing data, interpreting distributions, and communicating findings. Tūhuratanga (investigation) is framed as a tool for understanding our communities and environment in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Ngā Paearu Angitū — Success Criteria

  • ✅ Students can identify an investigative question, collect relevant data, and display it clearly.
  • ✅ Students can interpret statistical findings and discuss what they might mean for a real-world community or environmental context.

Differentiation & Inclusion

Scaffold support: Provide structured investigation frameworks (PPDAC cycle templates) for entry-level access. Offer partially completed data tables for students who need additional support. Extend capable learners by asking them to critique a statistical claim from a news article, or to design their own community data investigation.

ELL / ESOL: Pre-teach statistical vocabulary (median, mode, range, distribution, sample, population). Pair visual representations (graphs, tables) with plain-language explanations. Allow students to discuss statistical ideas orally before writing. Encourage use of home language for initial sensemaking.

Inclusion: Statistical investigation offers natural differentiation — all students can engage with the same real-world question at different levels of mathematical complexity. Neurodiverse learners benefit from structured, step-by-step investigation processes. Use collaborative group investigation formats that distribute roles (data collector, recorder, analyst, presenter).

Mātauranga Māori lens: Tūhuratanga — the practice of careful investigation — resonates deeply with mātauranga Māori. The maramataka is a sophisticated data system: tracking environmental patterns, seasonal cycles, and ecological indicators over generations. Iwi environmental monitoring — counting kaimoana populations, tracking water quality, observing bird migrations — is applied statistical thinking. Framing statistics within community and environmental inquiry connects data to mana whenua responsibilities.

Prior knowledge: Students should have basic familiarity with data displays (bar graphs, dot plots). No prior statistical investigation experience required — the PPDAC inquiry cycle provides accessible scaffolding for first-time investigators.

Curriculum alignment