← Back to Design Thinking Unit

Curriculum Alignment

Design Thinking: Innovation Process · Years 7–8 · Technology · Phase 3

4 unique verified statements
5 lessons carrying direct curriculum evidence
Phase 3 Years 7–8 only
Provenance rule. This companion is derived only from the verified Te Mātaiaho statement IDs already embedded in the current five lesson files. It does not import Phase 2 or Phase 4 wording to make the alignment appear broader. Duplicate use of the same statement across lessons is counted once here and mapped to every lesson that teaches it.

Stakeholder values, history, and cultural context

Clarity of purpose and relevance derive from stakeholder values, historical influences, and cultural contexts.
Technology Phase 3 Verified statement 51623

Where this is taught:

Measurable specifications and fit-for-purpose judgement

Measurable specifications provide valid criteria for judging how outcomes are fit-for-purpose.
Technology Phase 3 Verified statement 51473

Where this is taught:

Generating, exploring, and refining design ideas

Generating a wide range of design ideas using brainstorming and sketching techniques, exploring different forms and functions, and iteratively refining concepts before selecting them for development.
Technology Phase 3 Verified statement 51632

Where this is taught:

  • Lesson 3 — Ideate: divergent brainstorming, labelled sketches, convergent selection, and refinement against constraints.

Evidence-based critique across iterations

Critique uses evidence to justify spatial and product design refinements across iterations.
Technology Phase 3 Verified statement 51628

Where this is taught: