← Back to Lesson 7 | 🖨️ Print
 
 
 
A
The Event — Te Āhuatanga Hītori
Name of historical event:
Approximate dates (when did it happen?):
Why is this event historically significant?
Why did you choose this event?
Suitability check — tick all four before moving on:
Three distinct groups with different perspectives
Evidence available for each group
Real tension or conflict between perspectives
Specific enough to research (not too broad)
B
Three Groups + Perspectives — Ngā Rōpū e Toru

For each group, complete the three rows (P·E·E). Use dot points — full sentences come later in Lesson 8.

1Group name:
P
What did they believe / what was their perspective?
E
Source — who wrote/said it, when, what did it say?
E
Why did they hold this view? (identity / values / context / what was at stake)
2Group name:
P
What did they believe / what was their perspective?
E
Source — who wrote/said it, when, what did it say?
E
Why did they hold this view? (identity / values / context / what was at stake)
3Group name:
P
What did they believe / what was their perspective?
E
Source — who wrote/said it, when, what did it say?
E
Why did they hold this view? (identity / values / context / what was at stake)
C
The Core Clash — Rerekētanga · Excellence Extension

In 2–3 sentences: why were these three perspectives irreconcilable? What fundamental value, worldview, or assumption prevented the groups from agreeing? This becomes your Excellence conclusion in Lesson 10.

Starter: "The perspectives of [Group 1], [Group 2], and [Group 3] were irreconcilable because they rested on fundamentally different understandings of _______________."
Kaiako Sign-Off:
Date: ___________

📋 Teacher Planning Snapshot

Ngā Whāinga Ako — Learning Intentions

Students will engage with this resource to develop NCEA Level 2 historical thinking skills — examining how and why different groups held distinct perspectives on significant events in Aotearoa New Zealand's past, and constructing analytical essays using the PEE (Point–Evidence–Explanation) framework.

Ngā Paearu Angitū — Success Criteria

Differentiation & Inclusion

Scaffold support: Provide PEE sentence frames and perspective analysis templates for entry-level access. Students new to historical essay writing benefit from annotated exemplars showing the difference between describing and explaining a perspective. Extend capable writers by asking them to explain the enduring significance of the perspective clash — why does it still shape Aotearoa today?

ELL / ESOL: Pre-teach key historical vocabulary (perspective, corroboration, reliability, significance, agency) with visual glossaries. Allow oral explanation of perspective analysis before written essay drafts. Sentence starters and argument frames lower the language barrier without reducing the historical thinking demand.

Inclusion: Essay writing is cognitively demanding — chunk the process across multiple sessions with formative checkpoints. Neurodiverse learners benefit from explicit essay structure guides and colour-coded paragraph planning. Oral history discussion forums are a valid alternative assessment pathway for students who need them.

Mātauranga Māori lens: This achievement standard centres events where Māori perspectives have historically been marginalised or misrepresented. Placing tangata whenua perspectives as the primary lens — not as "the other side" — is an act of historical justice. Whakapapa provides a framework for understanding why events like the NZ Wars, land confiscations, and the Dawn Raids were not isolated incidents but linked expressions of colonial power. Tino rangatiratanga and mana motuhake frame what was at stake. Students develop empathy and critical historical consciousness together.

Prior knowledge: Students should have foundational knowledge of the relevant historical events (NZ Wars, Treaty of Waitangi, Dawn Raids, or other case study). Familiarity with the PEE structure supports engagement with essay-focused resources.

Curriculum alignment