← Back to Lesson 7 | 🖨️ Print
Suitability criteria — your event must meet all four:
Three distinct groups with different perspectives
Evidence available for each group
Real tension or conflict between perspectives
Specific enough to research (not too broad)
1840 · Colonial
Te Tiriti o Waitangi — Treaty of Waitangi
Three groups
Māori rangatira (signing chiefs) British Crown / Governor Hobson CMS Missionaries (Henry Williams)
Key evidence sources
Māori-language text of Te Tiriti Governor Hobson's dispatches to Colonial Office Henry Williams' letters, Feb 1840 Nopera Panakareao's statement at Kaitāia
Notes
Rich evidence. Strong Māori primary sources. Core tension: sovereignty vs. "shadow of the land." Recommended for students interested in law and Indigenous rights.
My interest: (circle stars)
1860–72 · NZ Wars
Ngā Pakanga o Aotearoa — The New Zealand Wars
Three groups
Māori hapū (resisting confiscation) British Crown / Colonial Government Pākehā settlers
Key evidence sources
Wiremu Tamihana's letters to Grey Governor Grey's dispatches, 1863 NZ Settlements Act 1863 (raupatu) Waitangi Tribunal reports (Waikato claim)
Notes
Studied in Lesson 4 — strong existing context. Best for students who found whenua / raupatu most compelling. Waitangi Tribunal reports = high-quality secondary sources.
My interest:
1881 · Passive Resistance
Te Whiti o Rongomai — The Parihaka Eviction
Three groups
Te Whiti's Parihaka community Crown / Minister John Bryce Pākehā settler press / public
Key evidence sources
Te Whiti's speeches at Parihaka (recorded) NZ Herald coverage, Nov 1881 John Bryce's parliamentary statements Te Ara: Parihaka entry
Notes
Excellent for studying non-violent resistance. Te Whiti's speeches are powerful primary sources. Strong contrast between Crown framing and Parihaka community experience. Good evidence for all three groups.
My interest:
1893 · Women's Rights
Women's Suffrage — The 1893 Petition
Three groups
Pākehā suffragists (Kate Sheppard / WCTU) Political opposition (Seddon, liquor lobby) Māori women (often excluded from narrative)
Key evidence sources
Kate Sheppard's essays + petition signatures Premier Seddon's statements (Parliament) Papers Past: suffrage coverage 1893 Meri Mangakāhia's 1893 Māori Parliament speech
Notes
Meri Mangakāhia's speech is a remarkable primary source — she argued Māori women should not only vote but stand for Parliament. The three-group structure works well. Strong evidence availability.
My interest:
1977–78 · Land Rights
Takaparawhau — Bastion Point Occupation
Three groups
Ngāti Whātua o Ōrākei Muldoon Government / Auckland City Council General NZ public / press
Key evidence sources
Joe Hawke's statements during occupation NZ Herald coverage 1977–78 Waitangi Tribunal: Ōrākei report (Wai 9) Muldoon government statements
Notes
506-day occupation — vivid, recent history. Strong photographic evidence. The Waitangi Tribunal's Ōrākei report is an authoritative secondary source. Good for students interested in urban Māori land rights.
My interest:
1974–76 · Immigration
Ngā Taiwhanga Ata — The Dawn Raids
Three groups
Pacific Island communities (overstayers) Muldoon Government Māori solidarity / Polynesian Panthers
Key evidence sources
Polynesian Panthers communiqués Muldoon Hansard, 1974–75 PM Ardern's 2021 apology speech Melani Anae: Polynesian Panthers (book)
Notes
Studied in Lesson 6 — strong existing context. Recommended for Pasifika students or those who found Lesson 6 most compelling. The 2021 apology provides a unique "looking back" source.
My interest:
1981 · Sport & Politics
The Springbok Tour
Three groups
HART anti-apartheid protesters Rugby supporters / NZRFU Māori community (colonial parallels)
Key evidence sources
HART protest statements NZRFU official statement, June 1981 PM Muldoon, Hansard, July 1981 Geoff Chapple, 1981: The Tour
Notes
Studied in Lesson 5 — rich existing context. Four perspectives available (can use any three). Best evidence base of all approved events. Recommended for students who found Lesson 5 most compelling.
My interest:
1986 · Human Rights
Homosexual Law Reform Act 1986
Three groups
Reform advocates (Gay Task Force) Church / conservative NZ (petition signatories) Government / Fran Wilde (reform MP)
Key evidence sources
Fran Wilde's Parliamentary speeches Church petition (record 800,000 signatures) Gay Task Force press releases, 1985–86 NZ History: Law Reform entry
Notes
Powerful, recent history. Strong contrasting primary sources. The church petition is one of the largest in NZ history. The debate about identity, law, and moral values maps directly onto the irreconcilability framework.
My interest:
My first choice: _______________________ My backup choice: _______________________
Bring this sheet with your Event Selection Planner to your teacher for sign-off before Lesson 8.

📋 Teacher Planning Snapshot

Ngā Whāinga Ako — Learning Intentions

Students will engage with this resource to develop NCEA Level 2 historical thinking skills — examining how and why different groups held distinct perspectives on significant events in Aotearoa New Zealand's past, and constructing analytical essays using the PEE (Point–Evidence–Explanation) framework.

Ngā Paearu Angitū — Success Criteria

Differentiation & Inclusion

Scaffold support: Provide PEE sentence frames and perspective analysis templates for entry-level access. Students new to historical essay writing benefit from annotated exemplars showing the difference between describing and explaining a perspective. Extend capable writers by asking them to explain the enduring significance of the perspective clash — why does it still shape Aotearoa today?

ELL / ESOL: Pre-teach key historical vocabulary (perspective, corroboration, reliability, significance, agency) with visual glossaries. Allow oral explanation of perspective analysis before written essay drafts. Sentence starters and argument frames lower the language barrier without reducing the historical thinking demand.

Inclusion: Essay writing is cognitively demanding — chunk the process across multiple sessions with formative checkpoints. Neurodiverse learners benefit from explicit essay structure guides and colour-coded paragraph planning. Oral history discussion forums are a valid alternative assessment pathway for students who need them.

Mātauranga Māori lens: This achievement standard centres events where Māori perspectives have historically been marginalised or misrepresented. Placing tangata whenua perspectives as the primary lens — not as "the other side" — is an act of historical justice. Whakapapa provides a framework for understanding why events like the NZ Wars, land confiscations, and the Dawn Raids were not isolated incidents but linked expressions of colonial power. Tino rangatiratanga and mana motuhake frame what was at stake. Students develop empathy and critical historical consciousness together.

Prior knowledge: Students should have foundational knowledge of the relevant historical events (NZ Wars, Treaty of Waitangi, Dawn Raids, or other case study). Familiarity with the PEE structure supports engagement with essay-focused resources.

Curriculum alignment