🧭 Capstone Voyage Rubric
Aromatawai — Navigation Physics, Lesson 10

Ingoa / Student Name: _________________ Rā / Date: _________________

The task being marked

Lesson 10 asks ākonga to complete a simulated ancestral Pacific voyage (for example Taputapuātea to Aotearoa), applying vector mathematics, wave reading and star observation, and to present a navigator's log of the voyage. This rubric marks that log and the reasoning in it.

Kaiako note. The four levels below are this unit's own scale, not a national standard. Year 10 sits at NZC Level 5, before NCEA; nothing here should be reported as an NCEA grade. Use the descriptors to say what to do next, not to rank the class.

Criteria

Criteria Beginning (1) Developing (2) Proficient (3) Advanced (4)
Plotting the course
vectors, dead reckoning (L8)
States a heading and a distance, but the log does not show how they were worked out. Adds headings and distances over several legs. Arithmetic slips, or speed, time and distance are not consistently linked. Resolves each leg into components and combines them correctly. Speed × time = distance is used consistently, and the final position follows from the working. As Proficient, and accounts for at least one drift factor (current or leeway), showing how it changes the plotted position.
Reading the ocean and sky
waves, currents, stars, refraction, seabirds (L1, L2, L5, L6, L7)
Names one or two signs a navigator might use. Uses several signs, but treats them as separate facts rather than evidence about where the waka is. Uses at least three independent signs — for example a star bearing, a swell direction and a bird sighting — and says what each one tells the navigator. As Proficient, and reasons about disagreement: what to trust when two signs point different ways, and why.
Physics of the waka
hull and sail (L3, L4)
Mentions that the hull floats or the sail catches wind. Describes buoyancy or lift in general terms, without connecting it to a decision made on the voyage. Explains a design or sailing decision using buoyancy or aerofoil lift, with the physics stated correctly. As Proficient, and weighs a trade-off — for example hull shape against load, or sail angle against speed made good.
The log as communication
evidence and reasoning (L9, L10)
A list of events with little reasoning. Records decisions, but a reader cannot always tell what evidence produced them. Each significant decision is traceable: the observation, the reasoning, the action. Units and quantities are stated. As Proficient, and is honest about uncertainty — where the position is least reliable, and what would have been checked next.
Two knowledge systems, held accurately
whole unit
Refers to traditional navigation only as background colour. Describes traditional and modern methods separately. Shows where a traditional technique and a physics explanation describe the same phenomenon, and represents both accurately. As Proficient, and is precise about what each system is for — without claiming one is a primitive version of the other.

Kaiako feedback

What the log does well:

One thing to strengthen next: