Lesson 2: Tika, Hē, me te Pono

Truth, Lies & Bias

Year 8 Critical Thinking Unit | 45 minutes

Students learn to identify bias, fake news, and evaluate source credibility

📝 Materials Needed

👨‍🏫 Teacher Preparation Notes

Key Learning Goals:

Vocabulary:

Lesson Structure

🔍 Starter: News Headline Challenge 10 minutes

Display these headlines about Matariki becoming a public holiday:

Source A - RNZ News:

"Government announces Matariki public holiday to begin in 2022, marking significant recognition of Māori culture"

Source B - Social Media Post:

"BREAKING: Govt forces ANOTHER holiday on hardworking Kiwis while economy crashes!!! #EnoughIsEnough"

Source C - Stuff.co.nz:

"Matariki public holiday: What you need to know about New Zealand's newest national day"

Quick Discussion Questions:

  1. Which sources seem most reliable? Why?
  2. What language makes some sources seem biased?
  3. How can you tell if a source is trustworthy?

💻 Main Activity: Fact-Checking Challenge 20 minutes

Using Google Fact Check Explorer

Student Task (Pairs):

  1. Open Google Fact Check Explorer: factcheckexplorer.withgoogle.com
  2. Search for claims about current NZ issues (provided list below)
  3. Evaluate 3 different fact-checks
  4. Complete evaluation worksheet

Suggested Search Topics:

Teacher Support During Activity:

📚 Cultural Connection: Oral vs. Written Evidence 10 minutes

Te Ao Māori Perspective on Evidence

Discussion Starter:

"Traditional Māori knowledge was passed down through pūrākau (oral narratives) for centuries. How is this different from written records? Which is more reliable?"

Comparison Activity: Create class comparison chart

Oral Tradition (Pūrākau) Written Records
Strengths:
  • Preserved for thousands of years
  • Contains cultural wisdom
  • Flexible, adaptable to context
  • Personal connection to storyteller
Strengths:
  • Exact preservation of words
  • Can be verified by multiple people
  • Date and author clearly recorded
  • Less likely to change over time
Limitations:
  • Can change with each telling
  • Hard to verify exact details
  • May be lost if not passed on
Limitations:
  • Author's bias affects content
  • May lack cultural context
  • Can be deliberately falsified

Key Question: "How can we use both types of evidence to get a more complete picture of truth?"

📊 Wrap-up: Source Reliability Checklist 5 minutes

Class Creation of "Reliability Indicators":

📊 Assessment: Source Evaluation

Students evaluate one news article using the reliability checklist

Assessment Criteria:

📄 STUDENT WORKSHEET - FACT-CHECKING INVESTIGATION

Name: _________________ Date: _________________

Part 1: Headline Analysis

1. Which Matariki headline seemed most reliable? Why?

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

2. What words or phrases showed bias in the unreliable sources?

_________________________________________________

Part 2: Fact-Check Investigation

Topic searched: _________________________________

3. What claim were you fact-checking?

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

4. What did the fact-checkers conclude?

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

5. What evidence did they use?

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

6. Do you trust this fact-check? Why or why not?

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

Part 3: Oral vs. Written Evidence

7. Give an example of when oral tradition might be more reliable than written records:

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

8. Give an example of when written records might be more reliable:

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

Part 4: Source Evaluation

Evaluate this news article using our reliability checklist:

[Teacher will provide a current news article to evaluate]

Reliability Indicator ✓ or ✗ Evidence
Author credentials listed
Recent publication date
Neutral language used
Sources/evidence provided

9. Overall reliability rating (1-10): _____ Explanation:

_________________________________________________

_________________________________________________

Vocabulary Check

10. Match the te reo Māori terms:

🏠 Homework/Extension

🔗 Next Lesson Preview

Lesson 3: Logical Fallacies - Students will learn to spot common errors in reasoning like ad hominem attacks and false causes, using examples from NZ political speeches and advertisements.

📋 Teacher Planning Snapshot

Ngā Whāinga Ako — Learning Intentions

Students will engage with this resource to develop te whakaaro māramatanga — critical and analytical thinking skills — examining claims, evaluating evidence, identifying bias, and constructing reasoned arguments. This unit frames critical thinking through both Western analytical traditions and the kōrero-based reasoning of Te Ao Māori.

Ngā Paearu Angitū — Success Criteria

Differentiation & Inclusion

Scaffold support: Provide argument frames (claim → evidence → reasoning → counter-argument) for entry-level access. Use structured controversy activities where students argue assigned positions. Offer extension tasks requiring students to analyse a real media article or policy document using the lesson's critical framework.

ELL / ESOL: Pre-teach argumentative language structures ("I argue that…", "The evidence suggests…", "However, one might counter…"). Allow oral argument as a first step before written production. Sentence frames and argument maps lower the language barrier while maintaining cognitive demand.

Inclusion: Structured debate and discussion formats benefit all learners — particularly neurodiverse students who thrive with explicit rules and clear roles. Affirm that disagreement done respectfully is a high-value academic and civic skill. Allow quiet processing time before group discussion. Offer written alternatives for students who find oral argument challenging.

Mātauranga Māori lens: Te whakaaro māramatanga — enlightened thinking — reflects a long tradition of reasoned debate in Te Ao Māori. The whare (meeting house) is a place of kōrero, where multiple perspectives are heard before decisions are made. Tikanga requires that arguments be made with integrity and respect (mana). Māori oratory (whaikōrero) is a sophisticated critical tradition — whakataukī encode compressed wisdom that often challenges surface-level thinking.

Prior knowledge: Best used within a sequence building critical thinking skills progressively. No specialist knowledge required for entry-level engagement with structured tasks.

Curriculum alignment