Best for
Ecology, food-chain, and human-impact units where students need a more complete systems view than a single straight-line food chain.
Science • Years 5-9 • Energy flow and ecological change
Use this handout to help ākonga trace how energy moves through ecosystems, build a food web, and predict the ripple effects when one part of the system changes.
This page already includes the role overview, draw-on web space, and disturbance prompts. Te Wānanga can rebuild it around your chosen local ecosystem, species set, or restoration scenario.
The web-building, explanation, and extension tasks are all included on this page.
Use the companion page to connect this handout to ecology, interdependence, and system-change reasoning. The real value is in helping students explain consequences, not just label levels.
Ecosystems in Aotearoa can look very different from place to place, but the same core idea remains: living things depend on each other and on the wider conditions of their environment.
Kaitiakitanga matters here because when one part of the system is harmed, the effects are often wider than they first appear. A food web is a useful way to make those connections visible.
Plants and algae that make food using sunlight.
Animals that eat other living things for energy.
Organisms that break down dead material and return nutrients to the system.
Use arrows to show how energy moves between these organisms. Add one more organism from your own knowledge if you can.
A wetland is drained or polluted, so insect numbers drop sharply. What effects might this have on other parts of the web?
Start with one simple chain before adding extra connections to make a web.
Build the web and explain one ripple effect using cause-and-effect language.
Explain why decomposers matter and how a human action could affect multiple levels at once.
Students may respond with labelled diagrams, arrows, oral explanation, or fuller writing depending on readiness.
Level 3–4: Investigate how living and physical systems work; understand relationships between organisms and their environments; collect, interpret, and evaluate scientific evidence to explain natural phenomena.
Level 3–4: Understand how human activity affects natural environments; explore the connection between ecological health and community wellbeing; recognise the role of cultural knowledge in environmental decision-making.
Mātauranga Māori is a sophisticated knowledge system built through centuries of careful observation, hypothesis, testing, and refinement — the same processes that define scientific inquiry. Māori knowledge of ecology, weather patterns, seasonal change, and animal behaviour guided sustainable resource management for generations before Western science arrived in Aotearoa. Understanding science through a dual-knowledge lens — bringing mātauranga Māori and Western science into dialogue rather than hierarchy — produces richer, more contextually grounded understanding. The concept of kaitiakitanga reminds us that scientific knowledge carries obligations: understanding how natural systems work means accepting responsibility for how we treat them.
This handout is designed to be used alongside the broader unit resources available at Te Kete Ako handouts library. Related resources from the same unit are linked in the unit planner. All resources are provided — no additional preparation is required to use this handout in your classroom.
Students will engage with this resource to build understanding of Aotearoa New Zealand's ecosystems, biodiversity, and the role of kaitiakitanga in environmental stewardship.
Scaffold support: Provide sentence starters, word banks, or graphic organisers to scaffold access for students who need it. Offer entry-level and extension tasks to address a range of readiness levels.
ELL / ESOL: Pre-teach key vocabulary and provide bilingual glossaries where available. Allow students to respond in their home language first.
Inclusion: Use accessible formats — clear font, adequate whitespace, structured tasks. Neurodiverse learners benefit from chunked instructions and choice in how they demonstrate understanding.
Prior knowledge: Best used after the relevant lesson sequence. No specialist prior knowledge required for entry-level engagement.