🎯 PLD Goals
My Professional Learning & Development goals — building Te Kete Ako, growing my te reo Māori, and strengthening literacy across the curriculum — with honest reflection on what has worked and what has not.
Goal 1: Development of Te Kete Ako
| Goal Type | Professional, Curriculum, Tool-building |
|---|---|
| Goal Statement | Build a platform that gives New Zealand teachers better, mātauranga-Māori-aligned resources and saves them planning time — so their energy can go back to their students, where it belongs. |
| Links to Professional Standards | Teaching Council Standards:
|
| Specific Targets |
|
| Initial Learning Actions |
|
| On-going PLD Needs | Web development and infrastructure; accuracy of curriculum alignment (there is still a tail); and quality control on AI-assisted authoring so the platform stays genuinely good rather than "sloppy". |
| Date | Strategy/Action & Rationale | Reflection/Review |
|---|---|---|
| Holidays Term 2–3, 2025 |
Strategy: Started building a website to hold and share the resources
I was making. Rationale: I could see teachers are massively overworked, and that good planning takes an enormous amount of time and energy. If I could make that easier, it would free teachers to focus on their students. I also needed these resources myself, and Mangakōtukutuku desperately needed stronger unit planning across a broad range of subjects — a gap recognised both by me and by ERO. |
The beginning: I realised the resources I was making should be shared, and could be, by building my own site. I called it Te Kete Ako. At first it was just to help Mangakōtukutuku. |
| Term 3–4, 2025 | Strategy: Taught myself to build it properly, from nothing. Rationale: A link is easier to share than a pile of printouts, and a real platform could hold whole units, not just handouts. |
The hard yards: I had never done any real programming — only website builders, never raw from scratch. The early AI coding models were not good enough. Just getting authentication working took ages. Getting the curriculum right took forever (and there is still a tail). At one point I undid more than a month's work because the site had become too AI-sloppy — that was heartbreaking, but it was the right call. I learnt an enormous amount: I had not heard of the tools, I thought I would have to build the backend from scratch, I did not know backend-as-a-service existed. |
| 2025 (in the classroom) |
Strategy: Used Te Kete Ako to teach, and supplied a full unit built
on it to my department. Rationale: The real test of a teaching tool is whether it works with real learners. |
It was used: I taught a Kai / economics unit (food security and related ideas) that lived entirely on Te Kete Ako and gave it to the department. The Māori Wordle became a go-to Do Now — not just in my class, but in other classrooms too. Teachers found the site organically and used it. (Honest note: that Kai unit has since been enriched so heavily it is nothing like the original — the first version is gone.) |
| 2026 (where it is now) |
Strategy: Keep growing it, with mātauranga Māori aligned resources
for all learners at the centre. Rationale: Outside my own subject of Social Studies, many teachers do not incorporate mātauranga Māori well — especially in Maths and Science — even though there is such rich content there. Ala Bishop & Berryman, this is not only for Māori learners; it is for everyone. |
Reach: Principals have shown real interest, and teachers across the motu are using it. There are a surprising number of users in Christchurch, and it is being used in some kura — I had expected it to take hold in more Māori-predominant areas first, so that was a good surprise. |
| Evaluation: This is the goal I am proudest of and the one still most alive. Te Kete Ako is real, it is used, and it started from a genuine need I felt as a teacher. It is not finished — the curriculum-alignment tail remains, and the standard I hold it to (quality over "AI slop", mātauranga Māori done well across every subject) is an ongoing commitment rather than a box ticked. Building it also taught me an entire discipline from scratch, which is itself evidence of how I approach a problem I care about. | ||
Goal 2: Te Reo Māori & Tikanga
| Goal Type | Classroom Practice, Personal, Cultural Competence |
|---|---|
| Goal Statement | Develop my abilities to communicate in Te Reo as well as Tikanga Māori and seamlessly utilise it throughout my classroom practice. |
| Links to Professional Standards | Teaching Council Standards:
|
| Specific Targets |
|
| Initial Learning Actions |
|
| On-going PLD Needs | As I progress, I will identify additional professional learning needs in cultural practice, pronunciation coaching, and curriculum integration of mātauranga Māori. |
| Date | Strategy/Action & Rationale | Reflection/Review | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb-March Term 1 |
Strategy: Enrolled in university "Te Reo for the Classroom" course
AND Monday evening community courses. Bought Te Kākano and Scotty
Morrison's
Māori Made Easy. Downloaded Drops app. Made classroom labels. Rationale: Wanted to attack it from all angles. Thought evening classes plus uni course plus two textbooks would guarantee fluency. |
Reality: Immediately overwhelmed. University course assumed prior
knowledge. Got through only ~4 chapters of Māori Made Easy before stalling.
Monday nights became a struggle to stay awake after teaching. Early Warning Signs: Fell behind on university assignments by Week 3. Good at vocabulary (kupu) but completely lost with sentence structure/grammar. Drops app used sporadically. What I Should Have Done: Recognized I was drowning and asked for help early - from teachers, from classmates, from my supervisor. Instead, I avoided the problem and hoped it would resolve itself. |
|
| April-May Term 2 |
Strategy: Made contact with Poihakena Marae hoping immersion would
help. Tried to catch up on missed university assignments. Kept using basic karakia
and greetings in classroom. Rationale: Thought marae connection might make learning click. Desperate to salvage university course. |
Marae Experience: First visit to Poihakena Marae was beautiful but
also intimidating. Realized how little I actually know - couldn't follow most
conversations. Kaumātua were kind but I felt like an imposter. University Course: Failed first major assessment. Feedback: "Insufficient understanding of basic grammatical structures." This was crushing. Tried to attend catch-up sessions but workload from teaching + GradDip felt impossible. Evidence: Friends commented that my pronunciation was improving. One noted, "It sounds so naturalistic the way you weave te reo into your everyday speech." Hidden Challenge: I actually feel confident listening and reading, but my Canadian accent means people underestimate my ability. I know the kupu, but I freeze on grammar when speaking. |
Classroom Use: Kept using basic phrases but started a "Lexicon Shift" - replacing specific English words permanently. "Kirikiriroa" comes to mind faster than "Hamilton" now. Also "Ngā mihi", "Aroha mai", "mahi", "kai", "tikanga", "kumareti" . This felt like real, permanent change even if the grammar wasn't there. |
| June-July Term 2-3 |
Strategy: Made difficult decision to withdraw from university
course rather than fail. Continued self-study with Te Whanake at much slower pace.
Maintained some marae connection. Rationale: Withdrawal better than failing on transcript. Self-study removes pressure and allows learning at my own pace. |
Withdrawal: Officially withdrew from university course June 15.
Felt like massive failure - this was one of my three main PLD goals. Had to tell
colleagues and principal. Embarrassing. Self-Study Reality: Working through Te Kākano 1 slowly. I've accepted that my strength is reading and listening comprehension, while speaking requires more confidence to overcome the grammar barrier. Creative Win: Created a Māori Wordle game for the students (and myself). It's actually amazing! It helped me engage with vocabulary in a fun, low-pressure way without the anxiety of sentence construction. Students loved it too. Classroom Integration: The "Lexicon Shift" strategy worked better than formal lessons. Using "Aroha mai" or "Ngā mihi" is automatic now. |
|
| Aug-Nov Term 3-4 |
Strategy: Continued slow, sporadic self-study. Focused on using
what I know well rather than constantly learning new material. Maintained occasional
marae visits when possible. Rationale: Realistic about capacity. Better to consolidate basic competency than keep failing at advanced goals. |
Honest Progress: Finished maybe 10 total chapters of Te Whanake by
December. Far from completing book. But what I have learned, I know better. Marae Visits: Visited Poihakena Marae regularly throughout the year (instead of monthly noho). Each time felt valuable for cultural understanding even if reo skills not dramatically improving. Classroom Reality: Use te reo for maybe 15-20% of classroom interactions (greetings, karakia, basic instructions). Students are familiar with these routines. Haven't progressed to full bilingual teaching envisioned. What I Actually Learned: Te reo can't be rushed. Requires consistent, sustained effort over years, not months. Cultural learning (tikanga) progressed better than language - relationships with Poihakena community are real even if my reo is still basic. |
|
| Mid-Year Evaluation (Week 5, Term 2): Progress: Struggling significantly. Behind in university course (failed first assessment). Te Whanake study inconsistent. Made marae connection but overwhelmed by cultural/linguistic complexity. Evidence: University assessment feedback showing lack of grammatical understanding. Attendance records showing missed lectures/tutorials. Partial completion of Te Whanake (4-5 chapters). Challenges: Drastically underestimated difficulty. Competing demands of teaching, GradDip, and te reo impossible to balance. Lack of foundational knowledge making everything harder. Honest Next Steps: (1) Decide whether to withdraw from university course or fail it, (2) Get realistic about what's achievable in remaining year, (3) Focus on cultural relationships even if language learning slow, (4) Stop avoiding the struggle and ask for help. |
|||
| End-of-Year Evaluation (Week 10, Term 4 - December
2025): Honest Truth: Failed this goal. Withdrew from university course (incomplete). Did not complete Te Whanake 1. Did not achieve daily classroom integration envisioned. What Actually Happened:
What I Did Learn (Despite Failure):
Realistic Next Year Goals:
|
|||
Goal 3: Literacy Across the Curriculum
| Goal Type | Classroom Practice, Cross-curricular |
|---|---|
| Goal Statement | Consolidate and extend my literacy teaching — pairing structured literacy with a genuine, infectious love of reading — and get better at intervention for my lowest learners. |
| Links to Professional Standards | Teaching Council Standards:
|
| Specific Targets |
|
| Initial Learning Actions |
|
| On-going PLD Needs | Early-stage structured literacy and intervention for learners years behind the curve (phonemes, graphemes, and below); and sustaining love-of-reading practice even under heavy workload. |
| Date | Strategy/Action & Rationale | Reflection/Review |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Term 3 (took over the class) |
Strategy: Combined structured literacy approaches with a genuine love
of reading that I shared openly with the ākonga. I built the in-class library around
hundreds of my own childhood books — real copies with my and my siblings' names in
them, "Happy Birthday Toby 1999" and the like — kept in the room and used regularly. I
topped the library up constantly from op shops (some started charging me pennies once
they knew the books were going to rangatahi). Kids took books home and I made no effort
to get them back: if they came back, good; if a kid loved a book enough to keep it,
even better. We ran SSR for 15 minutes after lunch, and I set a novel each term. Rationale: Because I genuinely love books, my enthusiasm was infectious. If I raved about a favourite and then produced the actual dog-eared copy, that landed. |
What happened: The Term 3 novel was Lemony Snicket's The Bad Beginning — short, and wonderful for the way it plays with prose and defines complex words (describing someone as "cantankerous", then explaining it). Kids borrowed my books, and I gave many away. The love of reading was real because it was mine first. |
| 2024 Term 4 (the big push) |
Strategy: Reading and Writing were taught as separate subjects, every
day. Learners chose the order of the day's lessons — they knew it would be one
maths, one reading, one writing, and one other thing I had planned, but the order was
theirs. I used asTTle-style comprehension texts, and added a bonus book report on top:
a learner-chosen book (with my approval), written about anything except the
plot — "I don't care what happens; I care what you thought, the bigger ideas,
the purpose, how it made you feel, whether you resonated with a character." I taught
PEEL paragraphs explicitly and scaffolded the report heavily. Rationale: Give learners agency over their day, and make the writing about their thinking, not recall. |
Result: The class lifted their literacy achievement by more than a stanine in about half a year — I have their asTTle data to evidence it. My proudest moment came from a hyperactive Year 8 girl (the one who later gave me the crocheted rabbit noted elsewhere in this portfolio). She burst into the room one morning and told her friends that her brother had barged in while she was reading — "ewww, why are you reading?" — and she had kicked him out: "yeah, get out — I read books now, I LOVE it!" I had to growl her in the moment for the noise and the language, but inside I was bursting; I was raving about it in the staffroom minutes later. I also made sure learners who needed learning support got it, and designed resources specifically for them. When a very experienced teacher joined our Year 8 team and treated me dismissively as "only a LAT", I marked my class's asTTles and asked her to moderate my marking, since I had never done asTTle marking before — a professional response that also settled the matter. |
| 2025 (an honest step back) |
Strategy: Continued literacy across my teaching, but leaned more on
structured literacy and traditional classroom methods. Rationale: I was pushed to my limits in the role that year, and fell back on what was most controllable. |
What I learnt: I was less successful at making the kids love reading, because I relied on structure over spark — and, looking back, that was the wrong trade. Structured literacy has its place, but instilling a love of words is the magic sauce. I also hit a design limit: I had learners so far behind — some Year 8s could not yet write their name or form all their letters — that lessons which were good for the class were too hard for my lowest. I caught myself doing it. Too many teachers pass their lowest learners to learning support and consider their duty done; it is so much more than that, and I want to be better at it. |
| Why literacy, and where next: Literacy enables thinking — it lets people understand themselves, their emotions and their ideas — and a lack of it becomes a serious barrier in the senior years, where the curriculum assumes a level of literacy across every subject. Age 12–13 is a superpower age for learning fast, and I want learners to feel that in themselves. Literacy is every teacher's job: in Social Studies it is a natural fit (even more than English, given the range of non-fiction sources to decode); in Digital Technologies it is a design decision teachers too often skip — so I build a substantial piece of writing into each project (see my class newsletters), and in an AI world, literacy is the skill of operating a language model well. My goal now is to get genuinely good at early-stage structured literacy and intervention for my lowest learners, while holding on to the love-of-reading magic even when the workload is heavy. I still give every learner a chosen book to keep at the end of the year. | ||