AI in the Classroom and the Workplace
Many New Zealand secondary teachers report encountering student work they suspect was AI-generated, while far fewer report having a clear school policy on AI use to refer to. The rapid arrival of capable AI writing tools created a policy vacuum that schools are still working to fill. (No named survey is cited here on purpose: if you want to quote a figure for this, find the study, check who was surveyed and when, and cite it — an unsourced percentage is not evidence, however confident it sounds.)
The debate about AI in education mirrors a broader debate about AI and work. Economists disagree about whether AI will primarily destroy jobs, primarily create new ones, or primarily transform existing roles. Historical analogies are mixed: the industrial revolution eliminated many craft jobs while creating factory employment; personal computers eliminated typing pools while creating enormous new categories of work. Whether AI follows a similar pattern depends on political choices about redistribution, training, and investment — not just on the technology itself.
For Māori and Pacific communities, the implications are particularly complex. Many jobs historically accessible to people without tertiary qualifications — administration, data entry, customer service — are among those most threatened by AI automation. Meanwhile, the AI tools themselves are trained largely on English-language data, meaning their performance in te reo Māori is limited, and their understanding of tikanga and mātauranga Māori is shallow at best.
The Te Hiku Media group in Northland responded by building their own AI tools using recordings from the community — retaining data sovereignty and ensuring the technology served Māori language revitalisation rather than extracting from it. Their approach has been cited internationally as a model for indigenous communities navigating AI development.