Best for
Week 5 synthesis after students have explored climate data, local impacts, traditional indicators, probability, and prediction quality separately.
Science + mathematics + mātauranga Māori • Years 7-10 • Unit 9 Week 5 synthesis
Use this worksheet to make one forecast using multiple signals. Students combine scientific data, local observation, and ngā tohu o te taiao to produce a forecast, explain their confidence, and decide what should happen next.
This version is ready to teach immediately. Te Wānanga becomes useful when you want iwi-specific indicators, local science datasets, or a more structured forecast template for your own context.
This rebuild turns the old generic page into a real synthesis task across science, mathematics, and mātauranga Māori.
The companion page makes the fit explicit around using ngā tohu o te taiao, ecosystem observation, and evidence communication to support defensible forecasting.
Scientific data can show patterns over time. Local observation and ngā tohu o te taiao can reveal place-specific changes that a graph might miss. Integrated forecasting asks students to use both responsibly.
This also keeps kaitiakitanga visible: if a forecast affects taiao or community wellbeing, the decision should be cautious, justified, and grounded in care for place.
Record the evidence sources you will use in your forecast.
| Signal source | What does it suggest? | How confident are you? | Why does it matter? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Science dataset or graph | |||
| Local observation or field note | |||
| Ngā tohu o te taiao or maramataka-related signal |
Which measurement or dataset carries the most weight?
Which observation or tohu adds the most useful insight?
Where do the signals point in slightly different directions?
What would help resolve the uncertainty?
What do you predict will happen next?
How confident are you, and why?
What should people do now because of this forecast?
What evidence will tell you whether the forecast was right?
Why is an integrated forecast stronger than using only one graph, one dataset, or one observation by itself?
Level 3–4: investigate how the Earth's climate has changed over time; understand how human activity affects ecosystems and atmospheric systems; use evidence to evaluate claims about climate impacts on local environments and communities.
Level 3–4: understand that environmental changes have consequences for communities and future generations; develop the ability to evaluate responses to environmental challenges and propose informed, responsible action.
Integrated forecasting has deep roots in mātauranga Māori. A skilled tohunga kōrero did not make environmental predictions from a single source — they wove together lunar phase, wind direction, species behaviour, ocean temperature, and accumulated seasonal memory into a single, contextualised judgement. That judgement carried weight because it was grounded in relationship: this person knew this place, and this place's patterns, intimately. Modern ensemble forecasting methods in climate science do something structurally similar — they combine multiple models and data sources to reduce uncertainty.
As you integrate your evidence sources today, hold both ways of knowing with respect. The scientific dataset gives you precision; the mātauranga Māori observation gives you place-specificity and long temporal depth. A forecast that accounts for both is stronger than one that uses either alone. Kaitiakitanga demands that forecasts serve the wellbeing of the taiao — which means they must be honest about uncertainty, cautious when evidence is mixed, and always oriented toward care for what comes next.
Resources already provided: