Best for
Planning Unit 2 source work, selecting class-ready archives or excerpts, and differentiating inquiry for Years 8-13.
Unit 2 Primary Source Library and Selection Guide · Years 7–10
This page gives you the curation spine. Te Wānanga becomes useful when you want a localised source pack, a custom inquiry sequence for your rohe, or a differentiated resource family built from one planning decision.
This page exists so kaiako are not left making source-selection decisions from scratch at 9:30 pm.
Historical inquiry is strongest when students meet fewer sources, but better chosen ones. Curate for quality, contrast, and teachability. Put one Māori-led voice beside one official or dominant source whenever you can, then decide what writing or discussion move should follow.
Use when students need to see how wording, translation, and power sit inside one agreement.
Best student pairings: text comparison inquiry or quick template.
Use when students need to encounter Māori resistance and Crown response through different source types.
Best student pairings: framework or deep template.
Use when students are ready to connect past injustice with Tribunal findings, settlements, and present-day debates.
Best student pairings: counter-narrative writing guide or seminar notes in the deep template.
| Learner pathway | Best source shape | Kaiako move | Best follow-up resource |
|---|---|---|---|
| Support | One short source plus one image or quote card | Pre-teach vocabulary, annotate together, use oral rehearsal | Quick Primary Source Analysis Template |
| Core | Two contrasting sources with clear purpose | Teach corroboration explicitly and ask for one supported judgement | Primary Source Analysis Framework |
| Extension | Three-source set with conflicting perspectives or language | Ask how interpretation shifts across time, audience, and power | Deep Template or Counter-Narrative Writing Guide |
If you bring in sources from your own rohe, check first whether the material is public, whether the language around it is accurate, and whether local iwi, hapū, marae, museum, or archive guidance is needed. Strong place-based teaching should deepen integrity, not shortcut it.
The companion page turns this planning guide into explicit curriculum language around source selection, evidence-based interpretation, and Aotearoa histories inquiry design.
Level 3–4: Investigate how historical, political, and economic processes shape societies; understand how people participate in communities to create change; analyse different perspectives on social, cultural, and environmental issues.
Level 3–4: Gather, evaluate, and synthesise information from multiple sources; construct well-reasoned arguments using evidence; communicate social science understanding clearly in written, oral, and visual forms.
Reflect on your learning. What was the most important idea? What question do you still have?
Social Sciences taught well in Aotearoa should be uncomfortable — because the history of this land is one in which Māori and other communities have faced injustice, and in which those injustices are not yet fully addressed. Mātauranga Māori offers frameworks for thinking about social change that go beyond Western political theory: the concept of tino rangatiratanga (self-determination), of kotahitanga (unity in purpose), of utu (reciprocity across time) — these are not abstract ideas but working tools for analysing how power has been distributed and how it might be redistributed more justly. Social Sciences that centres these frameworks gives students the analytical vocabulary to name what they see in the world and imagine what could be different.
This handout is designed to be used alongside other resources in the same unit. Related materials are linked in the unit planner. All content is provided — no additional preparation is required to use this handout in your classroom.