Best for
Statistics lessons that need authentic Aotearoa data, or social studies lessons that benefit from graphing, comparison, and quantitative reasoning.
Statistics + Social Studies • Aotearoa contexts • Years 8-11 • Print-ready tomorrow
Use this handout to help ākonga read settlement data carefully, construct simple visualisations, and discuss what numbers can and cannot show about redress in Aotearoa. The goal is mathematical thinking with historical integrity, not turning justice into a single dollar figure.
This version is ready now. Te Wānanga is useful when you want your own local settlement example, revised data sets, or a junior / senior differentiated statistics version of the same task.
If the lesson refers to graphing space, calculations, or interpretation prompts, they already exist here.
The companion page makes the curriculum links explicit across statistics, data visualisation, and social studies learning about systems, fairness, redress, and public understanding of Te Tiriti.
Treaty settlements can be represented in numbers such as year, financial redress, hectares, or numbers of claims. Those numbers help us notice patterns. But they do not capture everything that matters, such as language revitalisation, grief, mana, relationship repair, or the full scale of historical loss.
A mātauranga Māori lens reminds us that whenua and taonga are not only economic assets. So this inquiry asks students to read data carefully without pretending that a spreadsheet tells the whole story of justice.
| Settlement example | Year settled | Financial redress | One thing the numbers do not fully show |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waikato-Tainui | 1995 | $170 million | Intergenerational land loss, relationship repair, and ongoing Crown accountabilities. |
| Ngāi Tahu | 1998 | $170 million | The cultural, spiritual, and environmental significance of places and taonga. |
| Ngāti Awa | 2005 | $42.39 million | The long community cost of delay, exclusion, and loss of authority. |
| Central North Island Iwi Collective | 2008 | $161 million | How co-management and cultural redress shape long-term stewardship. |
| Tūhoe | 2014 | $170 million | Changes in governance, legal status, and relationships to Te Urewera. |
Label the title, axes, units, and scale clearly.
Complete the sentence: "This data is useful because ... but it does not fully show ..."
Start with a bar graph and use the sentence frame: "The graph shows ... because ..."
Compare the mean to the individual values and explain what that tells you about the set.
Explain whether a single statistic is enough to talk about redress, and justify your answer with both maths and social-studies reasoning.
Level 3–4: Apply number operations, statistical analysis, and mathematical reasoning to solve real-world problems; represent data using appropriate tools; interpret and communicate mathematical findings clearly.
Level 3–4: Understand how mathematical data and statistics are used to describe and analyse social, economic, and environmental patterns; recognise how data can reveal or obscure inequality.
Mathematics has always been part of mātauranga Māori — in the navigation of Te Moana-nui-a-Kiwa, in the architectural precision of wharenui, in the sophisticated storage and accounting systems of rua kūmara, and in the patterns of kōwhaiwhai and tukutuku that encode mathematical relationships in visual form. When Māori students engage with mathematics, they are not encountering something foreign: they are meeting a domain of knowledge that their tīpuna practised with extraordinary sophistication. Framing mathematical learning through whakapapa — connecting concepts to real Māori contexts — is not "cultural add-on" but recognition of where much mathematical knowledge lives in this land.
This handout is designed to be used alongside the broader unit resources available at Te Kete Ako handouts library. Related resources from the same unit are linked in the unit planner. All resources are provided — no additional preparation is required to use this handout in your classroom.
Students will engage with this resource to build pāngarau (mathematical) understanding — developing number sense, pattern recognition, and mathematical reasoning through hands-on, culturally grounded activities that connect to tamariki's world.
Scaffold support: Use concrete materials (blocks, counters, fingers) for entry-level engagement before progressing to abstract representations. Offer extension challenges asking students to generalise a pattern, write their own word problem, or explain their strategy to a partner.
ELL / ESOL: Mathematical language is a discipline-specific barrier — pre-teach key terms (e.g., equals, more than, fewer, pattern, factor) using visual representations. Allow students to demonstrate mathematical understanding non-verbally or through drawing. Pair with a bilingual buddy where possible.
Inclusion: Embed choice in how students engage — oral, written, or diagrammatic responses are all valid. Neurodiverse learners benefit from short, chunked task sequences with immediate feedback loops. Avoid timed drills in favour of exploratory tasks that reward curiosity. Make the maths classroom a safe place to be wrong and try again.
Mātauranga Māori lens: Pāngarau is a living tradition in Te Ao Māori — from the geometric precision of tukutuku and kōwhaiwhai patterns to the navigational mathematics of waka hourua, and the seasonal calculations embedded in maramataka. Framing early number sense within these contexts shows tamariki that mathematics is a human, culturally rich endeavour — not a foreign import. Encourage students to see counting, measuring, and patterning as acts of knowing their world.
Prior knowledge: Designed for early learners. No prior formal mathematics knowledge required. Teachers should assess current number knowledge before selecting appropriate entry points.