Best for
Primary source analysis, protest history, argument reading, and Aotearoa histories sequences on whenua, resistance, and tino rangatiratanga.
History • Aotearoa histories • Years 10-13 • Print-ready tomorrow
Primary Source Analysis: 1975 Memorial of Right
Use this handout to teach the 1975 Land March as a carefully argued public intervention. Ākonga work from recreated source excerpts, identify claim-evidence-values-action, and build a PEEL response about why the Memorial of Right mattered.
Free source-analysis task, premium adaptation path
This handout is ready to print now. Te Wānanga becomes useful when you want the same structure for a local petition, tribunal submission, speech, or a more formal assessment version with marking cues.
- Swap in a different source from your rohe, iwi history, or protest movement.
- Generate a support version with simplified evidence prompts or an extension seminar brief.
- Save the adapted resource into My Kete and refine it in Creation Studio later.
Kaiako planning snapshot
- Use length: 40-50 minutes for source reading and a PEEL paragraph, or longer if students compare this with another protest source.
- Grouping: Read the source set together first, then pairs for sorting the argument before individual writing.
- Prep: Decide whether you want to foreground land loss, Treaty breach, protest strategy, or the relationship between whenua and identity.
- Teaching move: Ask students how the source is trying to persuade, not only what facts it contains. That keeps the work analytical.
- Support / stretch: Use the PEEL frame for support; ask students to discuss limitations or silences in the recreated excerpts for stretch.
Resources already provided
- Concise historical context for the 1975 Land March
- Three recreated source excerpts based on widely taught Memorial themes
- An evidence ladder for claim, evidence, values, and action
- PEEL write-on space and a source-limits reflection prompt
- A matching teacher-only curriculum companion
If you want students to analyse a source and then write from it, the source set, planning frame, and writing space are already in one place.
Ngā Whāinga Akoranga / Learning Intentions
- We are learning how a historical source builds an argument.
- We are learning how evidence, values, and action work together in protest texts.
- We are learning to support historical conclusions with specific source details.
Paearu Angitu / Success Criteria
- I can identify the core argument in the Memorial of Right.
- I can use evidence from the source set to support my explanation.
- I can explain why the source mattered in the context of the 1975 Land March.
Curriculum integration / Te Marautanga alignment
The companion page makes the history and English links explicit around source interpretation, historical judgement, perspective, and evidence-based explanation of Aotearoa protest texts.
Source integrity note
The excerpts below are recreated classroom versions based on widely taught themes and arguments from the 1975 Memorial of Right. If you use the original document in class, teach provenance and context explicitly so students know what is primary and what is classroom adaptation.
Read first: why the Memorial mattered
When Dame Whina Cooper and the Land March reached Parliament in 1975, the marchers did not arrive only with emotion or symbolism. They carried a formal political argument. The Memorial of Right gathered evidence about land loss, Treaty obligations, and the consequences of Crown policy. It asked the state to recognise that continued land alienation was unjust and damaging.
Through a mātauranga Māori lens, the source should be read not just as legal complaint but as a statement about whenua, whakapapa, mana, and collective survival.
Treaty promise
“The Treaty of Waitangi promised Māori the undisturbed authority to retain land and taonga, yet later law and policy steadily weakened that promise.”
Scale of land loss
“Through court processes, public works takings, and purchasing policy, Māori land ownership was reduced on a devastating scale.”
Cultural consequence
“Land loss is not only economic. It harms identity, belonging, and the ability of future generations to stand in relationship with their whenua.”
Break the source argument into parts
- Claim: What central point is the Memorial making about land loss and Crown responsibility?
- Evidence: Which details or historical patterns does the source use to support that claim?
- Values: What ideas matter here: justice, Treaty promises, whakapapa, whenua, future generations?
- Action: What change does the source push government and the public toward?
Build your PEEL response
Use this frame if needed
- Point: The core argument of the Memorial was...
- Evidence: One important piece of evidence is...
- Explanation: This shows that...
- Link: This mattered in 1975 because...
Write your paragraph
Source limits and cautions
All sources carry perspective. This one is a protest document, so it is meant to persuade. That does not make it unreliable, but it does mean students should ask how purpose, audience, and historical moment shape the language used.
Support: identify one strength of the source. Stretch: explain one limitation and what extra evidence you would want alongside it.
Hononga Marautanga · Curriculum Alignment
Social Sciences — Tikanga ā-Iwi
Level 3–4: Investigate how historical, political, and economic processes shape societies; understand how people participate in communities to create change; analyse different perspectives on social, cultural, and environmental issues.
English — Research and Literacy
Level 3–4: Gather, evaluate, and synthesise information from multiple sources; construct well-reasoned arguments using evidence; communicate social science understanding clearly in written, oral, and visual forms.
Aronga Mātauranga Māori
Social Sciences taught well in Aotearoa should be uncomfortable — because the history of this land is one in which Māori and other communities have faced injustice, and in which those injustices are not yet fully addressed. Mātauranga Māori offers frameworks for thinking about social change that go beyond Western political theory: the concept of tino rangatiratanga (self-determination), of kotahitanga (unity in purpose), of utu (reciprocity across time) — these are not abstract ideas but working tools for analysing how power has been distributed and how it might be redistributed more justly. Social Sciences that centres these frameworks gives students the analytical vocabulary to name what they see in the world and imagine what could be different.
Ngā Rauemi Tautoko · Support Materials
This handout is designed to be used alongside the broader unit resources available at Te Kete Ako handouts library. Related resources from the same unit are linked in the unit planner. All resources are provided — no additional preparation is required to use this handout in your classroom.
📋 Teacher Planning Snapshot
Ngā Whāinga Ako — Learning Intentions
Students will engage with this resource to develop a decolonized understanding of Aotearoa's history — reading the past through the eyes of tangata whenua, examining primary sources critically, and understanding how colonisation continues to shape the present. This unit centres mana Māori as the starting point, not a footnote.
Ngā Paearu Angitū — Success Criteria
- ✅ Students can analyse a historical source for perspective, reliability, and significance — including identifying whose voices are centred or absent.
- ✅ Students can explain how a specific historical event — such as the NZ Wars, land confiscations, or the Dawn Raids — connects to present-day inequities and Māori-led responses.
Differentiation & Inclusion
Scaffold support: Provide annotated source analysis frames for entry-level access — guiding students through the OPCVL or SOLO process step by step. Offer extension tasks asking students to compare a colonial-era source with a contemporary Māori account of the same event, analysing how the historical narrative has been contested and reclaimed.
ELL / ESOL: Primary source language (particularly 19th-century English) presents specific challenges — pre-read sources with students and pre-teach archaic or specialist vocabulary. Allow students to express historical analysis in their home language first before translating to English. Bilingual glossaries support engagement without reducing intellectual demand. Some ELL students may bring first-hand experience of colonisation from other contexts — honour these as valid comparative perspectives.
Inclusion: Decolonized history can surface difficult emotions for Māori students encountering colonial violence and injustice in the curriculum for the first time. Create a trauma-informed classroom. Neurodiverse learners benefit from chunked tasks and clear analytical scaffolds. Ensure all students understand that the purpose of this unit is not guilt but understanding — and that understanding is the foundation of partnership and change.
Mātauranga Māori lens: Decolonizing history means more than "adding Māori perspectives" — it means recognising that the dominant historical narrative itself is a colonial artefact. Whakapapa is an alternative historical framework: tracing connections, obligations, and continuity across time. The NZ Wars were not distant events — their consequences live in land ownership patterns, economic disparities, and community structures today. Tino rangatiratanga — the right of self-determination — was not surrendered at Waitangi and has been asserted continuously through protest, legislation, and resurgence. Teaching this history is an obligation of Te Tiriti partnership.
Prior knowledge: Students benefit from foundational knowledge of the Treaty of Waitangi and its context. No specialist prior knowledge required for entry-level source analysis tasks — scaffolds are provided.
Curriculum alignment
- Aotearoa New Zealand Histories — Know: Understand that colonisation was a global process that had a specific and profound impact on tangata whenua in Aotearoa, and that Māori responses to colonisation have been continuous and varied.
- Do — Social Studies: Explore perspectives, use evidence to form conclusions, and share ideas — analyse primary sources, compare historical perspectives, and present findings.