Best for
After fieldwork, before posters or speeches, and whenever students need help moving from raw observations to reasoned environmental explanations.
Kaitiaki o te Awa • Systems thinking • Years 6-10 • Print-ready
Use this organiser to connect evidence with consequences. It helps ākonga move beyond “there is rubbish” and explain how actions, systems, and choices shape the health of an awa over time.
If you need a junior cause/effect version, a bilingual systems map, or a senior version with stronger environmental-policy language, Te Wānanga and Creation Studio can adapt this structure cleanly.
Linked next step: use the filled organiser to decide which action belongs in the checklist and final presentation.
Use the companion page to connect this organiser with participation, environmental decision-making, and discussion-rich explanation rather than treating it as a disconnected worksheet.
Whakapapa and kaitiakitanga both ask students to see relationships, not isolated facts. A mātauranga Māori lens helps ākonga understand that what happens on the land, in drains, on farms, or near streets can flow into the awa and change the conditions for people and species downstream.
| Cause or human activity | Effect on the awa or taiao | What evidence shows this? | Possible action / mahi kaitiaki |
|---|---|---|---|
What exactly happened here? What is the evidence? Where did we see it?
Who or what is affected? Is this a one-off issue or part of a bigger pattern?
Is the action realistic for our class, school, whānau, or community? Would it prevent the issue, not just tidy the evidence away?
Use sentence stems like “Because we observed…”, “This may lead to…”, and “A realistic response could be…”.
Complete one row with a teacher model and use arrows or labels if full sentences are hard.
Complete several rows and explain which issue feels most urgent for this awa.
Compare several causes and defend which action would produce the strongest long-term change.
Students can use diagrams, colour coding, or a spoken explanation before writing. That offers a valid pathway for dyslexic, ADHD, and other neurodivergent learners.
Which cause/effect pair should shape our next action, and why?
Level 3–4: investigate how human activity affects freshwater ecosystems; collect and interpret environmental data; understand that freshwater is a shared resource requiring collective stewardship.
Level 3–4: take informed action on local environmental issues; understand the roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders in environmental governance; develop advocacy skills grounded in evidence and values.
In te ao Māori, the taiao (natural world) is understood as an interconnected web — when the wai suffers, the whole taiao suffers. The cause-effect relationships in this organiser mirror this worldview: pakiaka (roots) connect to tangata (people), and disruption at any point ripples outward. When students trace a cause from a car park to an algae bloom to a dead kōura, they are learning to read the taiao as Māori kaitiaki have always read it — not as isolated facts, but as a living web of relationships that demands both understanding and response.
Resources already provided: